Posts Tagged ‘games’
February 17th, 2010 Posted 1:26 am
To break the monotony of wraggling over bills, Congress has adopted a fun little internal game that they will be playing with themselves. It’s called “I’m more bipartisan than you”. Each congressperson will amass points between now and November whenever they do something that shows bipartisanship. Of course the difficulty and excitement in the game is that no one there really knows what bipartisanship really means. So it will be hilarious to see how they stumble and bumble trying to figure out how the points system works, and then conniving games on how to score points.
Now the rules of the game are as follows. Every time a congressperson tells an opposing member “that’s a great idea”, he/she gets one point. It can be recognizing a great idea on a landmark bill, or discovering a new way of washing his hands after going to the poddy. It cannot be sarcasm (i.e. that’s a “great” idea), although the cleverest members may find ways to sneak some sarcasm into the dialog without the unclever, mind-numb opposing member even realizing it.
The congressperson will get 2 points if they have had a meaningful discussion with an opposing member to try to resolve a persnickety disagreement on a bill. Points, however, will not be awarded if the person makes disparaging comments about his grandmother, makes inaccurate comments about certain body dimensions, or uses the F-word in describing what actions the opposing member can do with himself.
They will get 3 points if they actually find common ground with an opposing member. Naturally, all feel that these points will be rarely given out. It’s not even clear that most of these hardheads even know what common ground means, so it will be especially difficult for any of them to know it if they see it. But points are theoretically available to the rare few who might take the time to probe and reconcile true desires of each side…or, more likely, the rare few who stumble upon common ground by sheer accident.
Finally, they will get 5 points if they actually come to a written bonefide agreement on an issue with an opposing member. A panel will question both members to make certain that they really agree and are not just pretending to agree to get extra points. Laughing or spit-takes during the panel questioning will put grave doubt on the authenticity of the agreement. And if found to be faked, it will cause both players to lose 5 points, and furthermore, both members will be forced to listen to House floor speeches for 3 solid days in a row as additional punishment.
No points will be awarded for “compromise” agreements, where both sides feel like they lost in the deal. Anyone caught compromising in this manner will be given a travelling stuffed toy duck that just quack, quack, quacks all day. The Quacker will be required to be kept on the Quackee’s desk for the next 24 hours.
The winner of the “I’m more bipartisan than you” contest will receive an upgrade to his seat in the congressional chamber to a La-Z-Boy Sleepmaster XF…so that if he/she is going to be bored, at least it will be a comfortable boredom. The seat has an optional vibration unit that can be energized when the House is set for a vote…or the unit can be switched off entirely to prevent sleep interruption.